A few days ago, a post titled 21 Days Burned in the Southern Hemisphere was sent by Wechat.

A few days ago, a blockbuster post titled "21 Days Burned in the Southern Hemisphere! Collective Silence of Western Media! This is the most cruel scene in the world…" was painted everywhere. Having been reluctant to comment on this topic, I hate it very much. Secondly, I want to wait for more credible news because I have doubts in my heart. Today, I have confirmed some ideas.
"Almost all fire pictures on social networks today are fake, old fires or not related to Amazon at all."
Personally, in the era of rumors flying all over the Internet, an objective review and evaluation is the minimum respect for a matter of importance.
Using false images to defraud traffic is neither respectful to the photographer nor to the disaster. What’s more, it’s a kind of fool to everyone who pays attention to this matter. As a practitioner, how can people trust the minimum authenticity of news materials if it can’t be guaranteed?
A news photographer risked all kinds of dangers to go to all kinds of extreme environments in order to leave the most authentic moment? What would he feel if he found out that he had paid for the photos he had obtained and used them to defraud traffic in an inexplicable place without his knowledge? Nowadays, some bad public numbers are just too low in cost of infringement to be so reckless.
Amazon Fire: Rainforests will not burn, but they will die of fire